Preview

Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie

Advanced search

Numerical Design Method of Quasilinear Models for Nonlinear Objects

https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.22.283-290

Abstract

Design modern methods of nonlinear control systems of nonlinear objects in the majority assume transformation of initial object model to some special forms. In these cases, it is reasonable to use quasilinear models as they can be designed on condition only of differentiability of the nonlinearities of the initial objects models. These models allow to find control analytically, i.e. as a result of the solution of some equations system, if the object, naturally, meets the controllability condition. The quasilinear models are synthesized traditionally analytically, bytransformation of initial nonlinear models using operation of the taking of partial derivatives from the nonlinearities of the initial objects models and the subsequent integration of these derivatives on the auxiliary variable with application of the known formulas of differentiation and integration. However, in many cases, the objects nonlinearities have so complicated character, that the operations of the differentiation and, in particular, the integration are executed very difficult by shown way. This complexity can be overcome by application of the new numerical design method of the quasilinear models, which excludesneed of the analytical differentiation and integration, but demands considerable number of the arithmetic operations. But now it is not the big problem since the modern multiprocessor controllers can carry out all the necessary operations for a short time. The developed method allows to receive rather exact, approximate piecewise-constant quasilinear models for the objects with the complicated nonlinearities. It is convenient to apply such models at numerical control of the nonlinear objects. The efficiency of a numerical method is shown by comparison of phase portraits of piecewise constant quasilinear and nonlinear models of a simple object and also by comparison of the state variables values of these models. The offered method can be applied to nonlinear control systems design for the nonlinear, characterized by complicated characteristics objects ship, aviation, chemical, agricultural and other industries.

About the Author

A. R. Gaiduk
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation

Dr. of Sci., Professor

Taganrog, 347922



References

1. Isidori A. Nonlinear control systems II, Berlin, Springer, 1999.

2. Lantos B., Marton L. Nonlinear control of vehicles and robots, London, Springer-Verlag, 2011.

3. Neydorf R. A., Gaiduk A. R., Kudinov N. V. Application of cut-glue approximation in analytical solution of the problem of nonlinear control design, Cyber-Physical systems: Industry 4.0 Challenges. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control,2020, vol. 260, pp. 117—132.

4. Zhu Y., Zhongsheng H.Controller dynamic linearisation-based model-free adaptive control framework for a class of non-linear system, IET Control Theory & Applications,2015, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1162—1172.

5. Sun H., Li S., Yang J., Zheng W. Global output regulation for strict-feedback nonlinear systems with mismatched nonvanishing disturbances, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control,2015, vol. 25, no. 15, pp. 2631—2645.

6. Lanzon A., Chen H.-J. Feedback stability of negative imaginary systems, IEEE Transactions on automatic control, 2017, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 5620—5633.

7. Xia M., Antsaklis P., Gupta V., Zhu F. Passivity and dissipativity analysis of a system and its approximation, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2016, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 620—635.

8. Rahnama A., Xia M., Antsaklis P. J. Passivity-based design for event-triggered networked control systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2018, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 2755—2770.

9. Furtat I. B., Tupichin E. A. The modified backstepping algorithm for nonlinear systems, Avtomatika i Telemekhanika, 2016, no. 9, pp. 70—83 (in Russian).

10. Ascencio P., AstolfiT., Parisini T. Backstepping PDE design: a convex optimization approach, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, 2018, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 1943—1958.

11. Gaiduk A. R. Polynomial design of nonlinear control systems, Avtomatika i Telemekhanika, 2003, no. 10, pp. 144—148 (in Russian).

12. Pshikhopov V. H., Medvedev M. Yu.Control systems design of submarine ship with nonlinear characteristics of executive units, Izvestiya YUFU. Tekhnicheskie Nauki, 2010, no. 3(104), pp. 147—156 (in Russian).

13. Gaiduk A. R. Nonlinear control systems design by transformation method, Mekhatronica, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie, 2018, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 755—761.

14. Gaiduk A. R. Estimation of nonlinear systems state variables, Avtomatika i Telemekhanika,2004, no. 1, pp. 3—13 (in Russian).

15. Fikhtengolts G. M. Differential and integral calculus, vol. 1,2, Moscow, Nauka, 1969.

16. Dvait G. B. Integral tables and other formulas: translation from English N. V. Levi, Under editorship of K. A. Semendyaev, Moscow, Nauka, 1978 (in Russian).

17. Topcheev Yu. I., Tsyplakov A. P. Book of problems according to automatic control theory. Manual for higher education institutions, Moscow, Mashinostroenie, 1977 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Gaiduk A.R. Numerical Design Method of Quasilinear Models for Nonlinear Objects. Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie. 2021;22(6):283-290. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.22.283-290

Views: 458


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1684-6427 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1253 (Online)