

Providing Spacecraft Inspection in the Plane of a Circular Orbit, Taking into Account the Second Zonal Harmonic
https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.26.326-332
Abstract
The problem of providing the inspection motion of one spacecraft (inspector) relative to another spacecraft (reference spacecraft) moving in a circular orbit is being solved. Inspection refers to the motion of the inspector around the reference spacecraft. In unperturbed motion, it is possible to select initial conditions that provide a closed trajectory of the inspector’s motion relative to the reference spacecraft; however, the influence of the Earth’s oblateness from the poles will lead to the evolution of such a trajectory. The paper presents two approaches that make it possible to select the initial parameters of the motion of the reference spacecraft and the inspector, which provide inspection motion taking into account the second zonal harmonic J2 of the Earth’s gravitational potential (oblateness of the Earth from the poles). In this case, the inspector’s motion is considered in the plane of the circular orbit of the reference spacecraft. The first approach is to select the initial positions of the reference spacecraft in its orbit, at which the oblateness of the Earth does not have a significant effect on the relative trajectory of the inspector. This motion of the inspector is close to the unperturbed relative trajectory. Analytical relationships are obtained that allow one to select the necessary motion parameters. The second approach is to select the relative velocity of the inspector, ensuring inspection motion, taking into account the influence of the Earth’s oblateness. This approach based on the equality of the total orbital energies of the inspector and the reference spacecraft.
About the Authors
D. P. AvariaskinRussian Federation
PhD, Associate Professor
Samara, 443086
N. A. Moriakov
Russian Federation
Samara, 443086
References
1. Gurfil P. Relative Motion Between Elliptic Orbits: Generalized Boundedness Conditions and Optimal Formationkeeping, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2005, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 761—767.
2. Xing J., Tang G., Xi X., Li H. Satellite Formation Design and Optimal Stationkeeping Considering Nonlinearity and Eccentricity, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2007, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1523—1527.
3. Ignatov A. D., Avariaskin D. P. The influence of the orbit eccentricity of the inspected object on the choice of inspection trajectory, Collection of proceedings of the XXV Russian Seminar on Motion Control and Navigation of Aircraft, 2022, pp. 244—247 (in Russian).
4. Ignatov A. D., Avariaskin D. P. Determination of the relative speed of the spacecraft for the formation of inspection motion in the plane of an undisturbed circular orbit, THE YOUTH. TECHNIQUE. SPACE. proceedings of the fourteenth all-Russian youth scientific and technical conference, Ser. "Library of the magazine "Voenmekh. Vestnik BSTU" Ministry of Science and Education of the Russian Federation Baltic State Technical University "Voenmech" Russian Academy of Rocket and Artillery Sciences Russian Academy of Cosmonautics named after. K. E. Tsiolkovsky St. Petersburg branch. Saint Petersburg, 2022, pp. 117—121 (in Russian).
5. Ignatov A. D., Avariaskin D. P. Determination of the conditions for the formation of a family of closed trajectories in the central field of attraction, implementing the inspection of an object moving in an elliptical orbit, Control in aerospace systems (UAKS-2022) named after. Academician E. A. Mikrina. Proceedings of the 15th multi-conference conference on management problems. Saint Petersburg. 2022, pp. 121—125 (in Russian).
6. Hamel J. F., Lafontaine J. D. Linearized dynamics of formation flying spacecraft on a J2-perturbed elliptical orbit, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2007, no. 30 (6), pp. 1649—1658.
7. Lane C. M., Axelrad P. Formation design in eccentric orbits using linearized equations of relative motion, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2006, no. 29 (1), pp. 146—160.
8. Sabatini M., Izzo D., Bevilacqua R. Special inclinations allowing minimal drift orbits for formation flying satellites, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2008, no. 31 (1), pp. 94—100.
9. Schaub H., Alfriend K. T. J2 Invariant Relative Orbits for Spacecraft Formations, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2001, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 77—95.
10. Xu G., Wang D., Poh E. K., Wu B. Periodic and QuasiPeriodic Satellite Relative Orbits at Critical Inclination, Aerospace conference, IEEE, 2009, 11 p.
11. Scherbakov M. S., Ananev A. V., Avariaskin D. P. Investigation and selection of a functional in the problem of synthesis of an optimal control law providing inspection motion, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, vol. 984, no. 1, pp. 1—8.
12. Scherbakov M. S., Avariaskin D. P. Studying problems on choosing stable orbits of nanosatellites to provide passive and periodic relative trajectories, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020, vol. 1536, no. 1, pp. 1—8.
13. Narimanov G. S., Tikhonravov M. R. Fundamentals of the theory of spacecraft flight, Мoscow, Mashinostroeniye, 1972, 607 p. (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Avariaskin D.P., Moriakov N.A. Providing Spacecraft Inspection in the Plane of a Circular Orbit, Taking into Account the Second Zonal Harmonic. Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie. 2025;26(6):326-332. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.26.326-332