Improving the Visual Interactive Analysis Method for Automation and Control of the Decision-Making Process in Multi-Criteria Design of Complex Mechanical Systems

For multi-criteria design problems of complex mechanical systems with a large number of control parameters, technical constraints, and quality criteria, the search for Pareto solution domain takes quite a lot of time varying from hours to days. In fact, the decision-maker (DM) desires to examine a small number of reasonable Pareto optimal solutions in order to understand the problem itself and control the decisionmaking in a simple manner. This paper presents the improvement of a visual interaction analysis method or VIAM developed by the authors with the aim of providing a tool for DM to define the optimal and mutually-agreed solutions in the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). Indeed, VIAM allows for evaluating the distribution domain of the Pareto optimal solutions defined by the genetic algorithm, which supports the DM to set additional thresholds for the objectives to filter the desired solutions and suggest to shrink or expand the threshold to control the search. In case of mutually-agreed solution non-existence, VIAM allows for providing instruction to reestablish the multi-objective problem that new Pareto solution domains can be found as desired by the DM. Based on VIAM, a visual interaction analysis tool or VIAT was developed by means of Matlab. VIAT was then used for the multi-criteria design of slider-crank mechanism for an innovative fruit vegetable washer with three objectives. Comparative study on the obtained results from VIAT with the existing design option and the obtained solution from the traditional method "concession by priority" has shown the effectiveness of the method proposed in this paper. VIAT is actually a very user-friendly tool that makes the multi-criteria design more practical especially for the mechanical system.

automation, decision-making, multi-objective optimization, visual interaction analysis method, trade-off-based method

1. Deb K. Multi-objective optimization, Search methodologies, Springer, Boston, MA, 2014, pp. 403-449.

2. Chiandussi G., Codegone M., Ferrero S., Varesio F. E. Comparison of multi-objective optimization methodologies for engineering applications, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 2012, no. 63, pp. 912—942.

3. Jurgen Branke, Kalyanmoy Deb, Kaisa Miettinen, Roman Slowinski. Multiobjective Optimization: Interactive and Evolutionary Approaches. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, 481 p.

4. Cui Y, Geng Z, Zhu Q, Han Y. Review: Multi-objective optimization methods and application in energy saving, Energy, 2017, vol. 125, pp. 681—704.

5. Nogin V. D. Restricting the Pareto set: an axiomatic approach, Moscow, Fizmatlit, 2015, 236 p. (in Russian).

6. Statnikov R. B., Gavrushin S. S., Dang M. H., Statnikov A. R. Multicriteria Deisgn of Composite Pressure Vessels, International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, 2014, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 252—278.

7. Rouse W. B., Pennock M.J., Oghbaie M., Liu C. Interactive visualizations for decision support: application of Rasmussen’s abstraction-aggregation hierarchy, Applied Ergonomics, 2017, no. 59, pp. 541—553.

8. Li H. L., Ma L. C. Visualizing decision process on spheres based on the even swap concept, Decision Support Systems, 2008, no. 45 (2), pp. 354—367.

9. Siraj S., Mikhailov L., Keane J. A. PriEsT: an interactive decision support tool to estimate priorities from pairwise comparison judgments, International Transactions in Operational Research, 2015, no. 22 (2), pp. 217—235.

10. Ishizaka A., Siraj S., Nemery P. Which energy mix for the UK? An evolutive descriptive mapping with the integrated GAIA (graphical analysis for interactive aid)-AHP (analytic hierarchy process) visualization tool, Energy, 2016, no. 95, pp. 602—611.

11. Kollat J. B., Reed P. A framework for visually interactive decision-making and design using evolutionary multi-objective optimization (VIDEO), Environmental Modelling & Software, 2007, no. 22 (12), pp. 1691—1704.

12. Hammond J. S., Keeney R. L., Raiffa H. Even swaps: A rational method for making trade-offs, Harvard Business Review, 1998, vol. 76, pp. 137—150.

13. Yang J., Li D. Normal vector identification and interactive tradeoff analysis using minimax formulation in multi-objective optimization, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans, 2002, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 305—319.

14. Luque M., Yang J., Wong B. Y. H. PROJECT method for multi-objective optimization based on gradient projection and reference points, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans, 2009, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 864—879.

15. Chen L. Xin B., Chen J. A trade-off based interactive multi-objective optimization method driven by evolutionary algorithms, Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, 2017, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 284—292.

16. Dang Hoang Minh. Automation and control the design and production of composite cylinders manufactured by the winding method, PhD dissertation, Moscow, 2013, pp. 206(in Russian).

17. Phung Van Binh. Automation and control the decisionmaking process in the multi-criteria design of the saw unit of the sawmill. PhD dissertation, Moscow, 2017, pp. 157 (in Russian).

18. Dang H. M., Phung V. B., Bui V. P., NguyenV. D. Multicriteria design of mechanical system by using visual interactive analysis tool, Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2019, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1187—1199.

19. Dieter George Ellwood, Linda C. Schmidt. Engineering design, Boston, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2009, pp. 912.

20. Dang H. M., Bui V. P., Phung V. B., Nguyen V. D. Design, development and performance evaluation of a new-type fruit vegetable washer, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research & Developments, 2020, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 265—274.

21. Bui V. P., Gavriushin S. S., Phung V. B., Dang H. M., Dang V. T. Generalized mathematical model of a slider-crank mechanism with spring used in a new-type fruit vegetable washer, The 26-th international scientific symposium named after A. G. Gorshkova, Kremenki, 2020, vol. 1, pp. 75—77 (in Russian).

22. Nga N. T., Minh D. H., Hanh N. T., Binh P. V., Phuong B. V., Viet D. N. Dynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of slider-crank mechanism for an innovative fruit and vegetable washer, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research & Developments, 2020, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 127—143.

23. Bui V. P., Gavriushin S. S., Phung V. B., Dang H. M., Prokopov V. S. Dynamic and stress analysis of the main drive system in design process of an innovative fruit-vegetable washer, Engineering Journal: Science and Innovation, 2020, vol. 100, no. 4.

24. Bui V. P., Gavriushin S. S., Phung V. B., Dang H. M., Prokopov V. S. Automation and management of design process of the main drive for an innovative fruits and vegetables washer, Information Technology, 2021, vol. 27, no. 2 (accepted) (in Russian).