Collaborative Multiagent Systems — an Alternative to Full Automation of Production
https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.21.404-411
Abstract
The paper proposes a new approach as an alternative to full automation of processes that meets current economic trends — collaborative multi-agent systems. In this concept, people and robots are considered as agents in a single sensory-information field, who perform tasks to achieve the goals of the collaborative multi-agent system. The urgency of collaborative multi-agent systems results from the fact that the industrial use of fully automated multi-component systems is limited by the financial and infrastructural unavailability of various industries to switch to completely unmanned technologies. The proposed approach combines the latest, but remaining quite recouped, technological advances along with highly skilled human labor. The use of collaborative multi-agent systems will be economically justified in the manufacture of products in small batches, in the conditions of rapid change of product lines, as well as the presence of staff shortages. The article shows that such an approach can significantly reduce automation costs, while ensuring that the specified production indicators are met. This approach allows taking a fresh look at a human, considering him and a robot as equal partners within a collaborative system. The basic concepts and distinctive characteristics of collaborative multi-agent systems are formulated and presented in the work, justifications for their use are given. Creating a new class of collaborative multi-agent systems requires solving a number of problems associated with the interaction of man and robot. The article considers issues related to the work of a person within a collaborative system, with a rational separation of human functions and an automated production system, in accordance with the necessary level of collaboration. The inclusion of a person with his psychoemotional and physical characteristics as an equivalent agent of a multi-agent system causes difficulties in formalizing collaborative multi-agent systems associated with the need to take these features into account and create a sensory-information system. The inclusion of a person with his psychoemotional and physical characteristics as an equivalent agent of a multi-agent system causes difficulties in formalizing collaborative multi-agent systems associated with the need to take these features into account and create a sensory-information system. The paper discusses ways to formalize a collaborative multi-agent system and management approaches.
About the Author
V. V. SerebrennyRussian Federation
Corresponding author: Serebrenny V. V., PhD, Head of Department "Robotic Systems and Mechatronics"
Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, 105005
References
1. Crisman Jill D. Grand challenges for robotics and automation: The 1996 ICRA panel discussion, IEEE Robotics Automat. Mag., 1996, no. 3, 4, pp. 10—16.
2. Shereuzhev M., Serebrenny V. Industrial collaborative multi-agent systems: main challenges, Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Electromechanics and Robotics "Zavalishin’s Readings", Springer, 2019.
3. Yuschenko A. S. Collaborative robotics: state and new challenges, Mekhatronika, avtomatizatsiya, upravlenie, 2017, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 8—13 (in Russian).
4. Serebrenny V. V. et al. Technological Collaborative Robotic Systems, AIP Conference proceedings, 2019.
5. Akella P. et al. Cobots for the automobile assembly line, IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, 1999.
6. Kolbeinsson A., Lagerstedt E., Lindblom J. Classification of Collaboration Levels for Human-Robot Cooperation in Manufacturing, Advances in Manufacturing Technology XXXII, OS Press, 2018.
7. Yuschenko A. S. Ergonomic problems of collaborative robotics, Robotics and technical cybernetics, 2019, vol. 7, no. 2 (in Russian).
8. Yuschenko A. S., Konyshev D. V., Vorotnikov.S. A., Zhonin A. A. Мimic Recognition and Reproduction in Bilateral Human-Robot Speech Communication, Springer, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 9812, ICR-2016, pp. 133—142.
9. Nazarova A. V., Ryzhova T. P. Methods and algorithms for multi-agent control of a robotic system, Bulletin of Bauman MSTU, 2012 (in Russian).
10. Munipov V. M., Zinchenko V. P. Ergonomics: HumanOriented Engineering, Software, and Environment Design, Lotos, Moscow, 2001 (in Russian).
11. Lomov B. F. Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology, Moscow, Nauka, 1999, с.163 (in Russian).
12. Kaliaev I. A., Gayduk A. R., Kapustian S. G. Models and algorithms of collective control in groups of robots, Moscow, Fizmatlit, 2009 (in Russian).
13. Islam Md Jahidul, Mo Jiawei, Sattar Junaed. Robot-toRobot Relative Pose Estimation using Humans as Markers, 2019, arXiv:1903.00820 [cs.RO].
14. Ermakova E. S. The study of the dialectical structures of thinking in psychology, Bulletin of Leningrad State University named after A. S. Pushkin, vol. 2, 2010 (in Russian).
15. Anokhin P. K. Philosophical aspects of the theory of a functional system. Nauka, Moscow, 1978 (in Russian).
16. Vorotnikov S., Ermishin K., Nazarova A., Yuschenko A. Multi-agent robotic systems in collaborative robotics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2018, vol. 11097 LNAI, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99582-3_28.
17. Peshkin M. A., Colgate J. E., Wannasuphoprasit W., Moore C. A., Gillespie R. B., Akella P. Cobot architecture, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 2001, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 377—390, doi: 10.1109/70.954751.
18. Figat M., Zieliński C. Methodology of Designing Multi-agent Robot Control Systems Utilising Hierarchical Petri Nets, International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2019.
19. Yurevich E. I. About the problem of group control of robots, Mekhatronika, avtomatizatsiya, upravlenie, 2004, no. 2, pp. 9—13 (in Russian).
20. Timofeev A. V. Intelligent Control and Operations Research for Multi-Agent Robot Systems, International Autonomous Systems: Intern. Scientific Issue, Karlsruhe-Ufa, USATU, 1998, pp. 119—124.
Review
For citations:
Serebrenny V.V. Collaborative Multiagent Systems — an Alternative to Full Automation of Production. Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie. 2020;21(7):404-411. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.21.404-411