Optimal Control of Transition Processes of Objects on Quick-Speed in a Multi-Criteria Environment
https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.21.200-207
Abstract
We analyze the known problems of optimal control of speed (OCS) and methods for their solution. It is shown that the use of the one criteria in these tasks (the speed criterion) does not sufficiently reflect real situations. The solution of the OCS problem in real situations leads to a deviation from the nominal or optimal values of a number of other indicators. Proceeding from this, a generalization of the OCS problem is considered taking into account other indicators as a criterion for optimal control. In this aspect, three generalized statements of the OCS problem are analyzed, where in the first formulation, the OCS task is expanded with additional constraints on other indicators; in the second setting, other indicators were used as criteria alongside with the performance criterion; and in the third formulation, the expansion of the formulation is considered with the introduction of restrictions also on the criteria themselves, formed from other measured indicators. In the article, the most general — the third multicriteria problem is considered as the subject of research and the necessary condition for optimality of its solution in the form of the maximum principle is obtained. A traditional and iterative scheme for solving the generalized by OCS problem is presented, based on the obtained necessary optimality condition, in contrast to the traditional criteria, which are also dependent on the degree of preference.
About the Author
T. G. RzaevAzerbaijan
Corresponding author: Rzaev Tofik Heydar, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Automation and Control of the Azerbaijan Technical University, Azerbaijan, Baku, AZ 1065
References
1. Feldbaum A. A. Optimal processes in systems of automatic control, Automation and Telemechanics, 1953, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 712—728 (in Russian).
2. Fieldbaum A. A. On the synthesis of optimal automatic control systems. Proceedings of the II All-Union meeting on the theory of automatic control, Moscow, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1955, pp. 325—360 (in Russian).
3. Feldbaum A. A., Pontryagin L. S., Boltyansky V. G., Gamkrelidze R. V., Mishchenko E. F. Fundamentals of the theory of optimal automatic systems, Moscow, Fizmatgiz, 1963, 552 p. (in Russian).
4. Pontryagin L. S., Boltyansky V. G., Gamkrelidze R. V., Mishenko Y. F. The mathematical theory of optimal processes. Moscow, Nauka, 1961, pp. 393 (in Russian).
5. Boltyansky V. G., Gamkrelidze R. V., Pontryagin L. S. To the theory of optimal processes, Reports of Academy of science of the USSR, 1958, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 10 (in Russian).
6. Gamkrelidze R. V. The theory of speed-optimal processes in linear systems. News, USSR Academy of Sciences, a series of mathematical sciences, 1958, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 449—472.
7. Dubovitsky A. Y., Milyutin A. A. The problem of extremum in the presence of restrictions, DAS USSR, 1963, vol. 149, no. 4, pp. 759 (in Russian).
8. Dubovitsky A. Y., Milyutin A. A. Tasks for an extremum in the presence of restrictions, Journal of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 1965, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 52—58 (in Russian).
9. Gabasov R., Kirillova F. M. and etc. Optimization methods. Tutorial, Minsk, Four quarters, 2011, 472 p. (in Russian)
10. Pupkov K. A., Ekupov N. D. Methods of the classical and modern theory of automatic control. The textbook in five volumes, vol. 4. Theory of optimization of automatic control systems, Publishing House MSTU Bauman, 2004, 743 p. (in Russian).
11. Afanasyev B. N., Kolmonovsky V. B., Nosov V. R. The mathematical theory of designing control systems, Moscow, Higher school, 1987, 447 p. (in Russian).
12. Atassi A. N., Khalil M. K. A separation principle for the stabilization of class of nonlinear systems, IEEE. Trans.Automat. Control, 1999, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1672—1687.
13. Constantinescu D., Croft E. A. Smooth and Time — Optimal Trajectory Planning for Industrial Manipulators along Specified Paths, Journal of Robotic Systems. Univercity of British Columbia, Vancouver. BC. Canada V671Z4. January 21, 2000, vol. 17(5), pp. 233—249.
14. Lippa Th., Boydb S. Minimum—time speed optimization over a fixed path, Mechanical Engineering. Stanford Univercity. CA. USA. Electrical Engineering. Stanford Univercity. CA. USA. December, 2013, pp. 1—15.
15. Hartl R. E., Sethi S. P., Vikson R. G. A survey of maksimum principle with state constants, SIAM Rev., 2013, vol. 37, pp. 181.
16. Abdullaev A. A., Rzaev T. G. Optimization of operational and scheduling in integrated automated control systems by enterprises, Baku, Elm, 1983, 235 p. (in Russian).
17. Rzaev T. G. Multicriteria structural identification of production processes. Izvestiya NAS Azer., A series of physical, technical and mathematical sciences, 2005, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 120—126 (in Russian).
18. Rzaev T. G. System identification. I part. Baku, Elm, 2007, p. 518 (in Russian).
19. Rzaev T. G. Modern management issues, Materials of the republican conference "Modern problems of automation and control", Baku, 2012, pp. 16—34 (in Russian).
20. Fedorenko R. P. An approximate solution to optimal control problems, Moscow, Science, Main Edition of the Physics and Mathematics Literature, 1978, 488 p. (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Rzaev T.G. Optimal Control of Transition Processes of Objects on Quick-Speed in a Multi-Criteria Environment. Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie. 2020;21(4):200-207. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.21.200-207