Preview

Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie

Advanced search

Artificial Intelligence in Mechatronic Systems: Problems of Embodiment

https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.21.93-101

Abstract

The article deals with the issues related to the possibility and limitations of technological creation of artificial systems endowed with consciousness and acting subject existing in the world of artificial subjective reality. The problems of creating an artificial personality in the given parameters are shown. The main obstacle to the creation of intelligent systems is the lack of progress in our understanding of the nature and mechanisms of the brain in the process of generating mental image and organization of purposeful activities. The transfer of psychology data to the engineering sphere is ineffective due to the difference in conceptual and instrumental areas of these disciplines. The approaches of synthetic psychology and pedagogy designed to provide a solution to the problem of creating an artificial subjective reality and techno-genic modification of man are presented.

About the Author

S. F. Sergeev
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Sergeev Sergey F., Professor, Dr. of Psychology Sciences, Head of Scientific and Research Laboratory of "Ergonomics of Complex Systems"


References

1. Sergeev S. F. On the way from bio-organization to cyberorganization: man in the shadow of artificial intelligence, Natural and artificial intelligence: methodological and social problems / ed. by D. I. Dubrovsky and V. A. Lektorsky, Moscow, "Canon+", ROOI "Rehabilitation", 2011, pp. 48—59 (in Russian).

2. Sergeev S. F. Psychological foundations of the problem of artificial intelligence, Mekhatronica, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie, 2011, no. 7, pp. 2—6 (in Russian).

3. Global future 2045. Convergent technologies (NBICS) and transhumanistic evolution, Ed. by D. I. Dubrovsky, Moscow, IBA Publishing house, 2013, pp. 158—168 (in Russian).

4. Cheklezov V. V. Sense of the planet (Internet of Things and the next technological revolution), Moscow, Russian research center for the Internet of Things, 2013 (in Russian).

5. Stanislaw Lem. Summa Technologiae. Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press, 2013. 448 pp.

6. Bykov E. NBIC-convergence of technologies: a historical review. Part I: 2001-2006, NBIKS-Nauka. Technologies, 2017, no. 1, pp. 12—24 (in Russian).

7. Bykov E. NBIC-convergence of technologies: a historical review. Part II: 2007-2013, NBIKS-Nauka. Technologies, 2017, no. 2, pp. 24—36 (in Russian).

8. Vinge Vernor (30—31 March 1993), The Coming Technological Singularity, Vision-21: Interdisciplinary Science & Engineering in the Era of Cyberspace, Proceedings of a Symposium held at NASA Lewis Research Center (NASA Conference Publication CP-10129), retrieved 2007-08-07. See also this HTML version, retrieved on 2009-03-29.

9. Kurzweil R. The Singularity Is Near, New York, Viking, 2005.

10. Sergeev S. F. Reflexive autoevolution of global intelligent technogenic environments, in Reflexive Processes and Management, Proceedings of the IX International Symposium October 17—18, 2013, Moscow, Rev. ed. Moscow: "Kogito-Center", 2013, pp. 245—248 (in Russian).

11. Ulam Stanislaw (May 1958). Tribute to John von Neumann, 64, #3, part 2, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society: 5.

12. Zinchenko V. P. Psychological bases of pedagogy (Psychological and pedagogical bases of construction of system of developing training D. B. Elkonin, V. V. Davydov), Moscow, Gardariki, 2002, 431 p. (in Russian).

13. Zinchenko V. P. Reflections on the soul and its education (Hour of the Soul), Expanded version of the report at the International Symposium "Spirituality of childhood", Machida (Japan) August 21—22, 2001, 2001, 33 p. (in Russian).

14. Kratin Yu. G. Neurophysiology and theory of reflection, Leningrad, Nauka, 1982, 84 p. (in Russian).

15. Sergin V. Ya. Consciousness and thinking: neurobiological mechanisms, Psychological journal of the international University of nature, society and man "Dubna", 2011, no 2, available at: http:// www.psyanima.ru (in Russian).

16. Dubrovsky D. I. The problem of the ideal. Subjective reality, Moscow, Kanon+, 2002, 368 p. (in Russian).

17. Kriman A. I. Idea of the Posthuman: a comparative analysis of transhumanism and posthumanism, Philosophical science, 2019, 62(4), pp. 132—147 (in Russian).

18. Huxley J. Transhumanism, in Huxley, J., New Bottles for New Wine, London, Chatto & Windus, 1957, pp. 13—17.

19. Hayry M. Categorical objections to genetic engineering – a critique, Ethics and Biotechnology / eds. A. Dyson and J. Harris, L.; N. Y., Routledge, 1994, pp. 202—215.

20. Vvedenskaya E. V. Bioethical analysis of the contradictions of transhumanism, Vestnik MITHT, Series: Social and Humanitarian Sciences and ecology, no. 3, 2014, pp. 35—40 (in Russian).

21. Mareeva E. V. From artificial intelligence to artificial soul, Questions of Philosophy, 2014, no. 1, pp. 171—177 (in Russian).

22. Arshinov V. I., Andreev A. L. Technoscience and the problem of man, Vestnik MEI, 2011, no. 4, pp. 110—116 (in Russian).

23. Litvak L. M. "Life after death": near-death experiences and the nature of psychosis: the experience of self-observation and psychoneurological research / ed. article by D. I. Dubrovsky. Ed. 2nd, remade and additional, Moscow, Canon+, 2007, 671 p. (in Russian).

24. Dubrovsky D. I. Problem of neurodynamic code of mental phenomena, Questions of Philosophy, 1975, no. 6, pp. 84—95 (in Russian).

25. Sergeev S. F., Sergeeva A. S. Man in complex technical systems: the problem of consciousness, Proceedings of the Second International scientific and practical conference "Human factor in complex technical systems and environments" (Ergo-2016) (St. Petersburg, Russia, 6—9 July 2016), St. Petersburg: interregional ergonomic Association, PEIPK, Severnaya Zvezda, 2016, pp. 66—72 (in Russian).

26. Edelman G. The Remembered Present: A Biological Theory of Consciousness, N. Y., Basic Books, 1989.

27. Ivanitsky A. M. Synthesis of information in key departments of the cortex as the basis of subjective experiences, Journal of higher nervous activity, 1997, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 209—225 (in Russian).

28. Metzinger T. (2009). The ego tunnel: the science of the mind and the myth of the self. New York, NY, US, Basic Books.

29. Blanke O., Orrigue S., Landis T., Seeck M. Stimulating illusory own-body perceptions, Nature, 2002, vol. 419, pp. 269—270.

30. Lenggenhager B., Tadi T., Metzinger T., Blanke O. Video Ergo Sum: Manipulating Bodily Self-Consciousness Science 24 August 2007, vol. 317, no. 5841, pp. 1096—1099.

31. Maselli A., Slater M. (2014). Sliding perspectives: dissociating ownership from self-location during full body illusions in virtual reality. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8:693.

32. Sergeev S. F. Psychology of technointegration and technomodification of man: theoretical and methodological basis, Actual problems of labor psychology, engineering psychology and ergonomics, iss. 8, ed. A. A. Oboznov, A. L. Zhuravlev, Moscow, Publishing house "Institute of psychology RAS", 2018, pp. 30—49.

33. The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism by Karl R. Popper and John C. Eccles, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1977, xvi + 597 p.

34. Witte V. A. Kognitologiya developing systems, Mekhatronica, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie, 2011, no. 10, pp. 45—50 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Sergeev S.F. Artificial Intelligence in Mechatronic Systems: Problems of Embodiment. Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie. 2020;21(2):93-101. https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.21.93-101

Views: 587


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1684-6427 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1253 (Online)