Preview

Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie

Advanced search

Construction of Highfailurestable Spacecraft Control System with Apply to Adaptive Logic in Diagnostic and Testing Algorithms

https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.19.664-672

Abstract

Different approaches to problem of improving onboard spacecraft control system failurestable on base principles of analytical excess, optimization and reconfiguration with using probability index and adaptive logic in diagnostic and testing algorithms are considered. One of problem is synthesis of spacecraft control system algorithms with incomplete apriory and distorted current information, action of uncontrolled and random factors, equipment failures and signal loss in information channel. Ways of failure diagnostic are examinated, in particular, problem excluding of failures sensors and power drives. Onboard attitude control system is synthesized and control algorithms are chosen, which guarantee robust stability and failure stability in presence indignant factors. Questions of onboard spacecraft control system failurestable improving are discussed on base reconfiguration with apply to adaptive logic in diagnostic and testing algorithms. The features of simulation are described on instrumental structure and operational modes of the attitude control system, the methods of dynamic research and computer simulation utilized during designing are indicated. Onboard complex control algorithms, diagnostic and reconfiguration are proposed for navigation, communication, geodesy satellites and earth inspectoral vehicles with prolonged utilization (more 10 years) in space flight conditions. Testing system have to decide two problem: discovering and eliminating faults. The mathematical system model is researching with implementation of analytic reserving. Difference signals are formed, which arise at fault appearance. The failure character is established by deciding rules on base difference signals and measures to it eliminating are took. The adaptive approach to development testing and diagnostic systems provide for realization of flexible logic of control system function to take into account factual onboard equipment state. The effectiveness of prepositional approaches and algorithms is confirmed by mathematical modeling results for several actual technical systems. Recommendations to their practical applications are gave.

About the Author

A. I. Zavedeev
Moscow aviation institutional (national research university).
Russian Federation

Zavedeev Arkadiy I., Associate Professor (Reader), PhD.

Moscow.



References

1. Kolodezniy L. P., Tchernodarov A. V. Nadezhnost’ i tehnicheskaja diagnostika (Reliability and technical diagnostic), Moscow, Pub. Acad. name N. E. Jukovskogo and Y. A. Gagarina, 2010, 452 p. (in Russian).

2. Grishin Y. P., Kazarinov Y. M. Dinamicheskie sistemy, ustojchivye k otkazam (Failurestable dynamic system), Moscow, Radio i svjaz’, 1985, 176 p. (in Russian).

3. Zemlyakov S. D., Rutkovskiy V. Y., Silaev A. V. Rekonfiguracija sistem upravlenija letatel’nymi apparatami pri otkazah (Reconfiguration of aerocraft control system subjected to failures), Avtomatika i Telemehanika, 1996, no.1, pp. 3—20 (in Russian).

4. Glinskiy V. A., Zavedeev A. I., Moiseyenko V. E. Razrabotka metodov proektirovanija otkazoustojchivyh sistem upravlenija i navigacii ajerokosmicheskih letatel’nyh apparatov na baze principov funkcional’nogo rezervirovanija i rekonfiguracii (The development of methods design of failurestable control and navigation system for aerospace vehicles on base functional reservation principles and reconfiguration), Aviakosmicheskoe Priborostroenie, 2002, no. 4, pp. 35—38 (in Russian).

5. Zavedeev A. I. Principy postroenija otkazoustojchivyh sistem upravlenija orientaciej ajerokosmicheskih letatel’nyh apparatov (Principles of design aerospace craft failurestable control orientation systems), Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie, 2011, no. 6, pp. 69—74 (in Russian).

6. Paolo Castaldi, Nikola Mimmo, Silvio Simani. Fault diagnostic and fault tolerant control strategies for aerospace systems, Proc. of 3-rd Conference on Control and Fault-Tolerant Systems. Pub. IEEE, no. 16449232, Spain, 2016, pp. 2269—2274.

7. Dan Ye, Shengping Luo, Junlong Wang. Two step faulttolerant controller design for linear time-delay systems with adaptive mechanism, Proc. of 42-nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. IECON. 2016. Pp. 6812—6817.

8. Mikrin E. A. Bortovye kompleksy upravlenija kosmicheskimi apparatami i proektirovanie ih programmnogo obespechenija (The onboard spacecraft control system and its software), Moscow, Publishing house of MGTU name N. E. Baumana, 2003, 652 p. (in Russian).

9. Zavedeev A. I., Kovalev A. Y. Postroenie bortovoj sistemy upravlenija kosmicheskogo apparata povyshennoj nadezhnosti na baze principa rekonfiguracii s primeneniem adaptivnoj logiki v algoritmah kontrolja i diagnostiki (Design of onboard highreliability spacecraft control system on base principles of reconfiguration with using adaptive logic in control and diagnostic algorithms), Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie, 2011, no. 11, pp. 67—70 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Zavedeev A.I. Construction of Highfailurestable Spacecraft Control System with Apply to Adaptive Logic in Diagnostic and Testing Algorithms. Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie. 2018;19(10):664-672. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.19.664-672

Views: 719


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1684-6427 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1253 (Online)