Preview

Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie

Advanced search

Terminology and Approaches to a Definition of Modular Robot Structure

https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.18.744-748

Abstract

A general approach to an interpretation of the existing terminology and to an application of the service robot component modularity classifications is considered. Classifications of modules according to functional and structural criteria are presented. Classification of modules according to functional criterion was developed for machine-building products and it is of little use for robot structure descri ption. Structural classification is oriented on a modular presentation of various robot subsystems but it is rather hard to use it to describe modular mechanical structures. Concepts of the modular robot architecture development are considered from positions of the component and functional approaches. The component approach is based on the Design Structure Matrix that gives a possibility to optimize the modular robot structure according to an objective function. The functional approach is used to analyze a composition of the robot functions and to decompose functions onto sub-functions to determine a modular composition of the robot. A brief overview of the morphotronic methods being developed currently and the contact & channel method used for the robots structural design is presented. Morphotronics is a new approach to the formal synthesis of the generalized system architecture. The contact & channel method enables to represent mechatronic robotic devices as a composition of components with inputs and outputs and to develop modular structures.

About the Authors

V. N. Kazantsev
Russian State Scientific Center for Robotics and Technical Cybernetics
Russian Federation


V. A. Pavlov
Russian State Scientific Center for Robotics and Technical Cybernetics
Russian Federation


References

1. ISO/IEC/IEEE 24765:2010 Systems and software engineering - Vocabulary.

2. ISO/NP 22166-1:2016 Robotics - Modularity for service robots. Part 1: General requirements.

3. Pahl G., Beitz W., Feldhusen J., Grote K.-H. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Springer, 2007.

4. Browning T. R. Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and new Directions // IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2001. Vol. 48, N. 3.

5. Erixon G. The Chart of Modular Function Deployment. Stockholm: Centre for Industrial Engineering at Dalarna University, 1998.

6. Resconi G., Chaczko Z. Morphotronic System (theory) // Computer Aided Systems Theory/EUROCAST. 2009.

7. Воронин А. В. Моделирование мехатронных систем. Томск: Изд. Томского ПУ, 2008.

8. Albers A., Zingel C. Extending SysML for Engineering Designers by Integration of the Contact & Channel - Approach (C & C2-A) for Function-Based Modeling of Technical Systems // Procedia Computer Science. 2013. Vol. 16.

9. Albers A., Korkiat S., Sauter C., Burger W. A Method to define a Product Architecture Early in Product Development Using the Contact and Channel Model // Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Design Methods and Tools (pt. 1). 2009. Vol. 5. Palo Alto, CA, USA.


Review

For citations:


Kazantsev V.N., Pavlov V.A. Terminology and Approaches to a Definition of Modular Robot Structure. Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie. 2017;18(11):744-748. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.18.744-748

Views: 399


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1684-6427 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1253 (Online)