

Control of the Selection Criteria of the Self-Organization Algorithm in the Problems of Correcting the Navigation Systems of Maneuverable Aircraft
https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.24.660-668
Abstract
The problem of constructing models with the desired properties, which are used in the algorithmic support of the sighting and navigation complex of the aircraft, has been studied. The quality of the used mathematical models largely determines the accuracy of the correction of the sighting and navigation system, therefore it is proposed to build models directly during the flight using some evolutionary algorithm. For example, using a self-organization algorithm. The ensemble of selection criteria for the self-organization algorithm includes various criteria that determine the properties of the selected models. Depending on the field of application of the models, they are given the desired properties by means of a self-organization algorithm with a variable ensemble of selection criteria. The selection ensemble consists of general, special criteria, as well as a controlled combination of qualitative criteria that selectively improve the performance of models. When the flight mode changes, the influence of one or another special criterion on the process under study changes. The change in the ensemble of selection criteria for the self-organization algorithm occurs automatically during the flight. Degrees of observability, controllability and parametric identifiability are used as improved qualitative characteristics. Over time, the degree of observability, controllabi lity, and parametric identifiability may change. Components that were well observable over time can become poorly observable. The weakly observable components of the state vector, although they are formally observable, in practice are not processed by estimation algorithms, since their evaluation is possible only on sufficiently large intervals of the system operation. A similar situation develops with models in the study of the quality of their controllability, as well as with the parameters of models during their identification. An algorithm for controlling the quality selection criteria and a diagram of the algorithm for generating models during the correction of a promising sighting and navigation complex of an aircraft are presented. Mathematical modeling has been carried out for various flight modes of the aircraft, such as straight flight, flight at different altitudes. The results of the simulation showed the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed algorithmic solutions
Keywords
References
1. Neusypin K. A. Modern systems and methods of guidance, navigation and control of aircraft, Moscow, MGOU Publishing House, 2009, 500 p. (in Russian).
2. Shen K., Proletarsky A. V., Neusypin K. A. Study of correction algorithms for aircraft navigation systems, Bulletin of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University. Series "Instrument making", 2016, no. 2 (107), pp. 28—39 (in Russian).
3. Proletarsky A. V., Neusypin K. A. Methods for correcting navigation systems and complexes of aircraft, Engineering Journal: Science and Innovations, 2012, no. 3(3), pp. 44 (in Russian).
4. Selezneva M. S. Kai S., Proletarsky A. V., Neusypin K. A. Dynamic system synthesis of algorithmic support for the navigation complex of an aircraft, Instruments and systems. Management, control, diagnostics, 2017, no. 2, pp. 36—42 (in Russian).
5. Selezneva M. S., Neusypin K. A., Proletarsky A. V. Development of the action acceptor of the measuring complex using the concept of dynamic system synthesis, Automation. Modern technologies, 2018, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 73—77 (in Russian).
6. Zhang L., Proletarsky A. V., Neusypin K. A., Selezneva M. S. Ways to improve the characteristics of nonlinear models of dynamic systems, Future of mechanical engineering in Russia, 2020, pp. 197—201 (in Russian).
7. Neusypin K. A., Kai S., Selezneva M. S. On Qualitative Characteristics of the State Variable Observability in Linear Time- Varying Models of Inertial Navigation Systems, Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie, 2018, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 346—354.
8. Shen K., Selezneva M. S., Neusypin K. A. Development of an algorithm for correction of an inertial navigation system in Off- Line mode, Measurement Techniques, 2018, vol. 60, pp. 991—997.
9. Shen K., Selezneva M. S., Neusypin K. A., Proletarsky A. V. Novel variable structure measurement system with intelligent components for flight vehicles, Metrology and measurement systems, 2017, pp. 347—356.
10. Shen K., Xia Y., Wang M., Neusypin K. A., Proletarsky A. V. Quantifying observability and analysis in integrated navigation, Navigation: Journal of The Institute of Navigation, 2018, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 169—181.
11. Dzhandzhgava G. I., Babichenko A. V., Neusypin K. A., Proletarsky A. V., Selezneva M. S. Navigation complex with enhanced observability and controllability, Aerospace instrumentation, 2016, no. 6, pp. 18—24 (in Russian).
12. Kai Sh., Neusypin K. A. Criterion of the degree of observability
13. of state variables of non-stationary systems, Automation. Modern technologies, 2016, no. 6, pp. 10—16 (in Russian).
14. Neusypin K. A. Selezneva M. S. Kai S., Proletarsky A. V. Algorithm for building models of INS/GNSS integrated navigation system using the degree of identifiability, 2018 25th Saint Petersburg International Conference on Integrated Navigation Systems (ICINS), IEEE, 2018, pp. 1—5.
15. Neusypin K., Selezneva M., Proletarsky A. Nonlinear information pro-cessing algorithm for navigation complex with increased degree of parametric identi-fiability, Recent Research in Control Engineering and Decision Making, Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 37—49.
16. Neusypin K. A., Fam S. F. Numerical criterion for the degree of controllability of state variables, Automation and modern technologies, 2007, no. 7, pp. 24—26 (in Russian).
17. Ivakhnenko A. G. Long-term forecasting and management of complex systems, Kiev, Technique, 1975, 312 p (in Russian).
18. Shashurin V. D., Selezneva M. S., Neusypin K. A. Technology
19. for forming the action acceptor of the navigation complex using dynamic system synthesis, Avtomatizatsiya. Modern technologies, 2018, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 121—126 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Selezneva M.S. Control of the Selection Criteria of the Self-Organization Algorithm in the Problems of Correcting the Navigation Systems of Maneuverable Aircraft. Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie. 2023;24(12):660-668. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.24.660-668