The Problem of Production Situations Identifi cation in the Systems of Production Processes Management of an Aircraft Repair Enterprise

This research provides a new approach to solving the problem of identifying emergency situations in the processes of aircraft repair work by forming a metric space of emergency situations and determining the distance between its points. The main stages of repair of Mi-8 helicopters and their modifications at a typical aircraft repair facility are described. The main stages of solving the problem of identifying production situations are determined. Model has been formed to classify the characteristics of production situations that arise during the repair of Mi-8 helicopters. When analyzing the production situation, it is compared with known situations recorded in the database. If its complete coincidence with known situations is found in the metric space of production situations, then the situation is considered known, the decision maker is issued a list of documents. Otherwise, in the metric space of situations, the point closest to the situation that has arisen is determined, and management personnel are given documents. After the end of the production situation, the updated information on the data, documents and recommendations used by the management personnel in the decision-making process is entered by experts into the computer memory, and the situation itself is included in the database used by the management system. A software package has been developed as part of the production process management systems of an aircraft repair company. The efficiency indicators of the implementation of the identification system of complex production situations at the enterprise are determined. 

1. Avetisyan Y. A., Kushnikov V. A., Rezchikov A. F., Rodichev V. A. Mathematical models and algorithms for operational management of emergency response processes, Mekhatronika, avtomatizaciya, upravlenie, 2009, no. 11, pp. 43—47 (in Russian).

2. Vorobyev V. G., Gluhov V. V., Kozlov U. V. Diagnostics and forecasting of the technical condition of aviation equipment, Moscow, Transport, 1984, 182 p. (in Russian).

3. Dobrynin A. S., Gudkov M. U., Koinov R. S. A case-based approach to incident management in automated process control systems. Programmnye sistemy i vychislitel’nye metody, 2020, no. 2. pp. 45—52, DOI: 10.7256/2454-0714.2020.2.31040 (in Russian)

4. Zuev V. E., Fadeev V. Ya. Laser navigation devices, Moscow, Radio i svyaz, 1987, 160 p. (in Russian).

5. Instructions for the technical operation of the MI-8 helicopter, vol. 4, pp. 45—57 (in Russian).

6. Markov A. I., Kushnikov V. A. The task of rapid diagnosis of defects in the fuselage of the MI-8 helicopter during a preliminary assessment of its maintainability, Izvestiia vuzov. Povolzhskii region. Tekhnicheskie nauki, 2012, no. 3, pp. 95—101 (in Russian).

7. Markov A. I., Kushnikov V. A. Tasks, models and algorithms of helicopter repair management at an aviation repair company, Estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki, 2012, no. 3, pp. 272—274 (in Russian).

8. Airworthiness standards of civil helicopters, Moscow, Izd. TSAGI, 1987, 350 p. (in Russian).

9. Pospelov G. S., Irikov V. A. Program-target planning and management, Moscow, Sovetskoe radio, 1976 (in Russian).

10. Pospelov D. A. Logical-linguistic models in control systems, Moscow, Energoizdat, 1981, 220 p. (in Russian).

11. Feigenbaum A., Feldmana J. Computing machines and thinking, Moscow, Mir, 1967, 552 p. (in Russian).

12. Akhmetov, A., Shkolnikova E. The development of methods for assessing the reliability of new aircraft and engines, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, vol. 421, iss. 1, pp. 120—130.

13. Amin M., Raza K., Khan S. Maintenance practices and challenges facing aviation industry in Pakistan, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 2019, vol. 25, iss. 1, pp. 75—87.

14. Borisov V., Boldyrev S., Sotnikova N. Efficiency of the Aviation Enterprises Activity, The Russian Experience, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1236, iss. 1, 2019, pp. 128—137.

15. Hamdaoui M., Korichi S., Ben L. Improvement of Decision Making by Implementing a Risk Management System in Aircraft Maintenance, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 2019, vol. 8, iss. 1.1, pp. 276—279.

16. Porter B., Bareiss R. Holte R. C. Concept learning and heuristic classification in weak-theory domains, Artificial Intelligence, 1990, vol. 45, iss. 1—2, pp. 229—263.