Buy (600 RUB)
Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
Desynchronization and Oscillatority in Excitable FitzHugh-Nagumo Networks
https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.24.292-299
Abstract
Study of dynamics of complex networked systems is one of the relevant problems. Networked systems can be in various states, ranging from complete synchronization, when all systems in the network are coherent, to complete desynchronization, i.e. complete incoherence in the functioning of systems. Synchronization phenomenon has already been well studied, namely, the mathematical definitions of synchronization are introduced, algorithms of studying synchronization are proposed, and synchronization conditions of various types of networked systems are established. Whereas a few works are devoted to the study of desynchronization nowadays. This paper introduces output desynchronization notion for networks of nonlinear systems. The definitions about Yakubovich oscillatority are considered and the link between oscillatority and desynchronization in networks of excitable nonlinear systems is established. Excitable systems are stable; therefore, they do not generate oscillations. Adding couplings between such systems can lead to occurrence of oscillations. The conditions about oscillatority in diffusively coupled networks of FitzHugh-Nagumo systems, which are the simplest neuron models, are derived. Firstly, the case of the simplest network of two coupled systems is considered, and afterwards, obtained result is generalized for the case of several systems. Laplace matrix spectrum plays crucial role in dynamics of such networks. The condition that connects the parameters of the uncoupled system in the network and the eigenvalues of the Laplace matrix, is obtained which determines whether the network is oscillatory or not. The number of systems that generate oscillations in such a network depends on the number of eigenvalues of the Laplace matrix that satisfy the obtained conditions. Obtained analytical results are confirmed by simulation. The results of simulation of complete desynchronization in the network, when all systems begin to oscillate, as well as a chimera-like state, in which only a part of the systems oscillates, while the other part are rest, are presented.
About the Author
S. A. Plotnikov
Institute for Problems in Mechanical Engineering of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg, 199178
References
1. Blekhman I. I. Synchronization in science and technology, New York, ASME Press, 1988, 255 p.
2. Pikovsky A., Rosenblum M., Kurths J. Synchronization: a universal concept in nonlinear sciences, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001, 411 p.
3. Fradkov A. Cybernetical physics: from control of chaos to quantum control, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 2007, 248 p.
4. Ma C., Yang Q., Wu X., Lu J. Cluster synchronization: from single-layer to multi-layer networks, Chaos, 2019, vol. 29, pp. 123120.
5. Kuramoto Y., Battogtokh D. Coexistence of coherence and incoherence in nonlocally coupled phase oscillators, Nonlinear Phenom. Complex Syst., 2002, vol. 4, pp. 380—385.
6. Panaggio M. J., Abrams D. M. Chimera states: coexistence of coherence and incoherence in networks of coupled oscillators, Nonlinearity, 2015, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. R67.
7. Schnitzler A., Munks C., Butz M., Timmermann L., Gross J. Synchronized brain network associated with essential tremor as revealed by magnetoencephalography, Mov. Disorders, 2009, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1629—1635.
8. Wong R. K., Traub R. D., Miles R. Cellular basis of neuronal synchrony in epilepsy, Adv. Neurol., 1986, vol. 44, pp. 583—592.
9. Hammond C., Bergman H., Brown P. Pathological synchronization in Parkinson’s disease: networks, models and treatments, Trends Neurosci., 2007, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 357—364.
10. Dzhunusov I. A., Fradkov A. L. Synchronization in networks of linear agents with output feedbacks, Autom. Remote Control, 2011, vol. 72, no. 8. pp. 1615—1626.
11. Panteley E., Loria A. Synchronization and dynamic consensus of heterogeneous networked systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 2017, vol., 62, no. 8, pp. 3758—3773.
12. Steur E., Tyukin I., Nijmeijer H. Semipassivity and synchronization of diffusively coupled neuronal oscillators, Phys. D, 2009, vol. 328, no. 21, pp. 2119—2128.
13. Plotnikov S. A., Fradkov A. L. Desynchronization control of FitzHugh-Nagumo networks with random topology, IFACPapersOnLine, 2019, vol. 52, no. 16, pp. 640—645.
14. Imangazieva A. V. Synchronization of a network of nonlinear plants with time delay as in condition under uncertainty, Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie, 2020, vol. 21, no. 5. pp. 266—273 (in Russian).
15. Franci A., Chaillet A., Panteley E., Lamnabhi-Lagarrigue F. Desynchronization and inhibition of Kuramoto oscillators by scalar mean-field feedback, Math. Control Signals Syst., 2012, vol. 24, pp. 169—217.
16. Zhao Y., Feng Z. Desynchronization in synchronous multi-coupled chaotic neurons by mix-adaptive feedback control, J. Biol. Dyn., 2013, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1—10.
17. Plotnikov S. A., Fradkov A. L. Desynchronization in oscillatory networks based on Yakubovich oscillatority, IFAC PapersOnLine, 2020, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 1037—1042.
18. Yakubovich V. A. Frequency-domain criteria for oscillation in nonlinear systems with one stationary nonlinear component, Sib. Math. J., 1973, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 768—788.
19. Tomberg E. A., Yakubovich V. A. Conditions for auto-oscillations in nonlinear systems, Sib. Math. J., 1989, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 641—653.
20. Tomberg E. A., Yakubovich V. A. On one problem of Smale, Sib. Math. J., 2000, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 771—773.
21. FitzHugh R. Impulses and physiological states in theoretical models of nerve membrane, Biophys. J., 1961, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 445—466.
22. Nagumo J., Arimoto S., Yoshizawa S. An active pulse transmission line simulating nerve axon, Proc. IRE, 1962, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 2061—2070.
23. Efimov D. V., Fradkov A. L. Conditions of Yakubovich oscillatority for nonlinear systems, Vestnik St. Petersburg University, Mathematics, 2006, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 203—215.
24. Hodgkin A. L., Huxley A. F. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve, J. Physiol., 1952, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 500—544.
25. Arenas A., DÍaz-Guilera A., Kurths J., Moreno Y., Zhou C. Synchronization in complex networks, Phys. Rep., 2008, vol. 469, no. 3, pp. 93—153.
26. Rosenblum M. G., Pikovsky A. S., Kurths J. Phase synchronization of chaotic oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996, vol. 76, pp. 1804—1807.
27. Afraimovich V. S., Verichev N. N., Rabinovich M. I. Stochastic synchronization of oscillations in dissipative systems, Izvestiya vuzov. Radiofizika, 1986, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1050—1060 (in Russian).
28. He W., Du W., Qian F., Cao J. Synchronization analysis of heterogeneous dynamical networks, Neurocomputing, 2013, vol. 104, pp. 146—154.
29. Plotnikov S. A., Fradkov A. L. On synchronization in heterogeneous FitzHugh—Nagumo networks, Chaos, Solit. Fract., 2019, vol. 121, pp. 85—91.
30. Franci A., Panteley E., Chaillet A., Lamnabhi-Lagarrigue F. Desynchronization of coupled phase oscillators, with application to the Kuramoto system under mean-field feedback. In 50th IEEE Conf. on Decis. Cont. & Europ. Cont. Conf., 2011, pp. 6748—6753.
Review
For citations:
Plotnikov S.A. Desynchronization and Oscillatority in Excitable FitzHugh-Nagumo Networks. Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie. 2023;24(6):292-299. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.24.292-299
Views:
407
.png)
Email this article 