Buy (600 RUB)
|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
Algorithmization of Guidance and Motion Control of a Space Manipulation Robot in the Service Tasks of a Non-Operative Spacecraft
https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.24.216-224
Abstract
Nowadays there are many non-functioning spacecraft in orbit that have run out of fuel, or have failed due to breakdown. Therefore, the concept of a serviced space and the development of space manipulation robot for extending the spacecraft service life are becoming expedient. Space manipulation robot will be able to perform a variety of tasks, from inspecting malfunctions of a serviced spacecraft, to performing repairs and refueling the target vehicle. The article proposes a strategy and algorithms for the guidance and motion control of a space manipulation robot at the stage of rendezvous with a non-cooperative spacecraft to perform maintenance tasks. The purpose of the article is to synthesize the control of the translational and rotational motion of the space manipulation robot for its convergence with the target satellite at a given distance. The control system is presented in the form of a hierarchical two-level "guidance-stabilization" system. At the guidance level, a transition quaternion of the associated coordinate system to the required position is formed, as well as thrust engine control, which ensures the translational motion of the space manipulation robot at the required velocity. At the stabilization level, a control is formed that superpose the associated coordinate system of the space manipulation robot with the direction to the served satellite. The article proposes a scheme and a mathematical model of the propulsion system, angular and translational motion of the service satellite. The modeling of the developed guidance and motion control algorithms in the SIMULINK environment has been carried out.
Keywords
hierarchical control system,
service satellite,
non-cooperative spacecraft,
space manipulation robot,
rendezvous with passive satellite
Supporting agencies: The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number 20-38-90261.
About the Authors
N. Yu. Kozlova
Bauman Moscow State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD student
Moscow, 105005
A. V. Fomichev
Bauman Moscow State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow, 105005
References
1. Vinogradov P. V., Zheleznyakov A. B., Spassky B. A. Modern directions of space robotics development, Robototekhnika i tekhnicheskaya kibernetika, 2015, vol. 4(9), pp. 3—12 (in Russian).
2. Tatsch A., Fitz-Coy N., Gladun S. On-orbit servicing: A brief survey, Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR’06), 2006, pp. 276—281.
3. Kozlova N. Y., Fomichev A. V. Promising on-orbit servicing tasks for spacecraft life extension, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2021, vol. 2318(1), pp. 130008.
4. Kozlova N. Y, Fomichev A. V. Mathematical model of free-flying space manipulation robot when approaching a noncooperative spacecraft, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, vol. 1864, no. 1, pp. 012131.
5. Flores-Abad A., Ma O., Pham K., Ulrich S. A review of space robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2014, no. 68, pp. 1—26.
6. Somov Ye. I., Butyrin S. A. Guidance and control of freeflying robot during completion of the rendezvous with a passive object in deep space, Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo centra Rossijskoj akademii nauk, 2017, vol. 19, no. 4-1, pp. 81—90 (in Russian).
7. Akhloumadi M. R., Ivanov D. Translational and angular motion control for spacecraft rendezvous with non-cooperative rotating object, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2021, vol. 2318, no. 1, pp. 050003.
8. Barbee B. W., Carpenter J. R., Heatwole S. et al. A Guidance and Navigation Strategy for Rendezvous and Proximity Operations with a Noncooperative Spacecraft in Geosynchronous Orbit, J. of Astronaut Sci., 2011, vol. 58, pp. 389—408, DOI: 10.1007/BF03321176
9. Matsumoto S., Jacobsen S., Dubowsky S., Ohkami Y. Approach planning and guidance for uncontrolled rotating satellite capture considering collision avoidance, International symposium on artificial intelligence, robotics and automation in space, Nara, Japan, 2003.
10. Seweryn K., Banaszkiewicz M. Optimization of the trajectory of a general free-flying manipulator during the rendezvous maneuver, AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2008, pp. 7273.
11. Navabi M., Akhloumadi M. R. Nonlinear optimal control of relative rotational and translational motion of spacecraft rendezvous, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2017, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 04017038.
12. Arantes G., Martins-Filho L. S. Guidance and control of position and attitude for rendezvous and dock/berthing with a noncooperative/target spacecraft, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, vol. 2014.
13. Breger L., How J. P. Safe trajectories for autonomous rendezvous of spacecraft, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2008, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1478—1489.
14. Boyarko G., Yakimenko O., Romano M. Optimal rendezvous trajectories of a controlled spacecraft and a tumbling object, Journal of Guidance, Control, and dynamics, 2011, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1239—1252.
15. Mesarovic M. D., Macko D., Takahara Y. Theory of hierarchical, multilevel, systems, Elsevier, 2000.
Review
For citations:
Kozlova N.Yu., Fomichev A.V. Algorithmization of Guidance and Motion Control of a Space Manipulation Robot in the Service Tasks of a Non-Operative Spacecraft. Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie. 2023;24(4):216-224. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.24.216-224
Views:
346
.png)
Email this article 