The Models and Algorithms for Product Quality Control in Welding by Robotic Technological Complexes
https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.23.637-642
Abstract
The article discusses models and algorithms that allow quality control in welding by robotic technological complexes. The difference of this approach to solving the problem lies in the use of the calculus of variations and the definition of action plans that ensure the minimum deviation of the actual values of the actual values of the process quality indicators from the given values. The input data of the model are the target values of the quality indicators of the technological process, their actual values for a certain period and lists of measures to improve the quality of the process. As a measure of the deviation of quality indicators, objective functions were considered, which are minimized when solving the problem. An approach is considered on the example of arc welding of metal structures using Kawasaki robotic technological complexes with C40 controllers. The area of application of the developed software is the control systems of robotic complexes.
Supporting agencies: The research was carried out within the state assignment of Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (themes № FFNM-2022-0010 and № FMRN-2021-0001)
About the Authors
D. S. Fominykh
Saratov Science Center of RAS. Institute of Precision Mechanics and Control of RAS, V. A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Сand. of Sc., Senior Researcher
A. F. Rezchikov
Saratov Science Center of RAS. Institute of Precision Mechanics and Control of RAS, V. A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. A. Kushnikov
Saratov Science Center of RAS. Institute of Precision Mechanics and Control of RAS, V. A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. A. Ivaschenko
Saratov Science Center of RAS. Institute of Precision Mechanics and Control of RAS, V. A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. S. Bogomolov
Saratov Science Center of RAS. Institute of Precision Mechanics and Control of RAS, V. A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Dinham M., Fang G Autonomous weld seam identification and localization using eye-in-hand stereo vision for robotic arc welding, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2013, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 288—301.
2. Shen H. Y., Wu J., Lin T., Chen S. B. Arc welding robot system with seam tracking and weld pool control based on passive vision, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2008, vol. 39, no. 7—8, pp. 669—678.
3. Agapakis J. E., Katz J. M., Friedman J. M., Epstein G. N. Vision-aided robotic welding. An approach and a flexible implementation, International Journal of Robotics Research, 1990, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 17—34.
4. Guillo M., Dubourg L. Impact & improvement of tool deviation in friction stir welding: weld quality & real-time compensation on an industrial robot, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2016, no. 39, pp. 22—31.
5. Shultz E. F., Cole E. G., Smith C. B., Zinn M. R., Ferrier N. J., Pfefferkorn F. E. Effect of compliance and travel angle on friction stir welding with gaps. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 2010, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 0410101—0410109.
6. Wu J., Zhang R., Yang G. Design and experiment verification of a new heavy friction-stir-weld robot for large-scale complex surface structures, Industrial Robot, 2015, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 332—338.
7. Ryberg A., Ericsson M., Christiansson A. K., Eriksson K., Nilsson J., Larsson M. Stereo vision for path correction in off-line programmed robot welding, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, 2010, pp. 1700—1705.
8. Ahmad S., Luo S. Coordinated motion control of multiple robotic devices for welding and redundancy coordination through constrained optimization in cartesian space, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 1989, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 409—417.
9. Liu Y. K., Zhang Y. M. Toward welding robot with human knowledge: a remotely-controlled approach, IEEE Tra nsactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2015, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 769—774.
10. Kim K. Y., Kim D. W., Nnaji B. O. Robot arc welding task sequencing using genetic algorithms, IIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineers), 2002, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 865—880.
11. Rezchikov A. F., Kushnikov V. A., Ivashchenko V. A., Fominykh D. S., Bogomolov A. S., Filimonyuk L. Y. Prevention of critical events combination in robotic welding, Journal of Machinery Manufacture and Reliability, 2017, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 370—379.
12. Fominykh D. S., Kushnikov V. A., Rezchikov A. F. Prevention unstable conditions in the welding process via robotic technological complexes, MATEC Web of Conferences, 2018, vol. 224, pp. 01045.
13. Fominykh D. S., Kushnikov V. A., Rezchikov A. F. Control of the welding process in robotic technological complexes using the system dynamics model, Proceedings of the International Multi- Conference on Industrial Engineering and Modern Technologies, FarEastCon, Vladivostok, 2019, pp. 8933981.
14. Kalman D. (2009). Leveling with Lagrange: an alternate view of constrained optimization, Mathematics Magazine, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 186—196.
Review
For citations:
Fominykh D.S., Rezchikov A.F., Kushnikov V.A., Ivaschenko V.A., Bogomolov A.S. The Models and Algorithms for Product Quality Control in Welding by Robotic Technological Complexes. Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie. 2022;23(12):637-642. https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.23.637-642
Views:
349
.png)
Email this article 