Preview

Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie

Advanced search

Optimal Control of Transfer to Vertical Orbits from Lyapunov Orbits Using Low-Thrust Engine

https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.23.158-167

Abstract

There are many different families of periodic orbits in the Earth-Moon system, such as Lyapunov orbits, halo orbits, vertical orbits, etc. The establishment of a lunar space station requires a spacecraft to be able to transfer among these orbits. Lyapunov orbits have been used by some missions and are well-studied orbits, while periodic vertical orbits can provide large amplitudes of spacecraft motion outside the plane of the Moon’s motion, which makes it possible to avoid shadowing of the orbits and use them as relay satellite in cislunar space. Modern researchers mainly consider the use of high-thrust engines for transfer. With the development of electric propulsion technology, the use of low, but long-acting thrust for deep space exploration has become especially relevant. This is due to the high specific characteristics of the propulsion systems of this type. In this article, an algorithm has been developed for determining the optimal control with a low-thrust engine for a transfer from Lyapunov orbit to a vertical orbit. The minimum time of flight or the minimum costs of the working body are used as criteria for optimality. In the calculation for solving the two-point boundary value problem of the optimal control theory, the parameter continuation algorithm is used, which allows to gradually get the transfer from some simple results to the final transfer trajectory. The results obtained make it possible to assert that the use of intermediate axial orbits allows the use of propulsion systems with lower thrust levels. In this case, the duration of the flight increases slightly with an almost unchanged consumption of the working body. Moreover, the homotopy method makes it possible to reduce the consumption of working body, while the control of the engine throttling becomes discrete. The results of this study and the algorithms proposed in this article can be used to determine the optimal program control and ballistic design of lunar missions.

About the Authors

Chongrui Du
Samara National Research University
Russian Federation

Samara



O. L. Starinova
Samara National Research University; Nanjing University of Science and Technology
Russian Federation

Samara; Nanjing



References

1. Parker J. S., Anderson R. L. Low-energy lunar trajectory design, JPL Deep-Space Communications and Navi gation Series, Wiley, 2014. P. 103—106.

2. Zeng H., Zhang J. Modeling low-thrust transfers between periodic orbits about five libration points: Manifolds and hierarchical design, Acta Astronautica, 2018, vol. 145, pp. 408—423.

3. Aksenov S. A., Beaver S. A. Aksenov S. A., Beaver S. A. Control of a Spacecraft Motion on a Halo-Orbit with Restricted Maneuver Directions, Nekotorye aspekty sovremennyh problem mekhaniki i informatiki, 2018, pp. 166—174 (in Russian).

4. Shaykhutdinov A. R., Kostenko V. I. Prospects for Using the Halo-Orbit in the Vicinity of the L 2 Libration Point of the Sun—Earth System for the Ground-Space Millimetron Radio Interferometer, Cosmic Research, 2020, vol. 58(5), pp. 434—442 (in Russian).

5. Richardson D. L. Analytic construction of periodic orbits about the collinear points, Celestial mechanics, 1980, vol. 22(3), pp. 241—253.

6. Rogov K. Computation of Libration point orbits and manifolds using collocation methods, Thesis Universitat Polit@cnica de Catalunya, 2016.

7. Richardson D. L. A note on a Lagrangian formulation for motion about the collinear points, Celestial Mechanics, 1980, vol. 22(3), pp. 231—236.

8. Grebow D. Generating periodic orbits in the circular restricted three-body problem with applications to lunar south pole coverage, MSAA Thesis, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University, 2006.

9. Calleja R. C. et al. Boundary-value problem formulations for computing invariant manifolds and connecting orbits in the circular restricted three body problem, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2012, vol. 114(1), pp. 77—106.

10. Xiangyu L., Dong Q., Yu C. Progress of three-body orbital dynamics study, Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2021, vol. 53(5), pp. 1223—1245.

11. Petukhov V. G. Method of continuation for optimization of interplanetary low-thrust trajectories, Cosmic Research, 2012, vol. 50(3), pp. 258—258 (in Russian).

12. Fain M. K., Starinova O. L. Ballistic optimization of the L1-L2 and L2-L1 low thrust transfers in the Earth-Moon system, 2015 7th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST), IEEE, 2015, pp. 95—98.

13. Shirobokov M. G., Trofimov S. P. Low-Thrust Transfers to Lunar Orbits from Halo Orbits Around Lunar Libration Points L1 and L2, Cosmic Research, 2020, vol. 58(3), pp. 181—191 (in Russian).

14. Pérez-Palau D., Epenoy R. Fuel optimization for lowthrust Earth—Moon transfer via indirect optimal control, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy. 2018, vol. 130(2). pp. 1—29.

15. Zhang C. et al. Low-thrust minimum-fuel optimization in the circular restricted three-body problem, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2015, vol. 38(8), pp. 1501—1510.

16. Pritchett R., Howell K., Grebow D. Low-thrust transfer design based on collocation techniques: applications in the restricted three-body problem, Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Columbia River Gorge, Stevenson, Washington, August 21—24, 2017, pp. 1—92.

17. Ilyin I. S., Sazonov V. V., Tuchin A. G. Transfer trajectories from low Earth orbit to a variety of restricted orbits in the vicinity of the libration point L2 of the Sun-Earth system, Preprinty Instituta prikladnoj matematiki im. MV Keldysha RAN, 2012, vol. 66, 25 p. (in Russian).

18. Luo T., Xu M., Dong Y. Natural formation flying on quasi-halo orbits in the photogravitational circular restricted threebody problem, Acta Astronautica, 2018, vol. (149), pp. 35—46.

19. Pan X., Pan B., Li Z. Bounding Homotopy Method for Minimum-Time Low-Thrust Transfer in the Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem, The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2020, vol. 67, pp. 1220—1248.

20. Saghamanesh M., Baoyin H. A robust homotopic approach for continuous variable low-thrust trajectory optimization, Advances in Space Research, 2018, vol. 62(11), pp. 3095—3113.

21. Petukhov V. G., Zhou J. Computation of the Perturbed Two-Impulse Trajectory between the Earth and Lunar orbits by the Continuation Method, Vestnik Moskovskogo aviatsionnogo institute, 2019, vol. 26(2), pp. 155—165 (in Russian).

22. Mingotti G., Topputo F., Bernelli-Zazzera F. Combined Optimal Low—Thrust and Stable—Manifold Trajectories to the Earth-Moon Halo Orbits, AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics, 2007, vol. 886(1), pp. 100—112.

23. Shampine L. F. et al. Solving boundary value problems for ordinary differential equations in MATLAB with bvp4c, Tutorial notes, 2000, vol. 2000, pp. 1—27.

24. Higham D. J., Higham N. J. MATLAB guide, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 2005.

25. Starinova O. L. Calculation of interplanetary flights of low-thrust spacecraft, Samara, Samarskij nauchnyj centr RAN, 2007, 196 p. (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Du Ch., Starinova O.L. Optimal Control of Transfer to Vertical Orbits from Lyapunov Orbits Using Low-Thrust Engine. Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie. 2022;23(3):158-167. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.23.158-167

Views: 707


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1684-6427 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1253 (Online)