Preview

Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie

Advanced search

Synthesis of a High-Precision Missile Homing System with an Permissible Stability Margin of the Normal Acceleration Stabilization System

https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.22.365-373

Abstract

The proportional guidance method-based missile homing systems (MHS) have been widely used the real-world environments. In these systems, in order to destroy the targets at different altitudes, a normal acceleration stabilization system (NASS) is often utilized. Therefore, the MHS are complex and the synthesis of these systems are a complex task. However, it is necessary to synthesize NASS during the synthesis of the MHS. To simplify the synthesis process, a linear model of the NASS is used. In addition, we make use of the available commands in Control System Toolbox in MATLAB. Because the Toolbox has the commands to describe the transfer function, determine the stability gain margin, and the values of the transient respond of the linear automatic systems. Thus, this article presents two methods for synthesizing the missile homing systems, including (i) a method for synthesizing the MHS while ensuring the permissible stability gain margin of the NASS, and (ii) a method for synthesizing the MHS while ensuring the permissible stability margin of the NASS by overshoot. These techniques are very easy to implement using MATLAB commands. The synthesis of the proposed MHS is carried out by the parametric optimization method. To validate the performance of the proposed techniques, we compare them withthe MHS synthesized by ensuring the stability margin of the NASS bythe oscillation index. The results show that, two our proposed methods and the existing method provide the same results in terms of high-precision. Nevertheless, the proposed methods are simple and faster than the conventional method. The article also investigates the effect of gravity, longitudinal acceleration of the rocket, andblinding of the homing head on the accuracy of the synthesized MHS. The results illustrate that they have a little effect on its accuracy.

About the Author

Quang Thong Do
Le Quy Don Technical University
Viet Nam

 Ph.D.

Hanoi



References

1. Kanashchenkova A. I., Merkulova V. I. Aviation radio control systems. Vol. 2, Moscow, Radio Engineering, 2003, pp. 23—30 (in Russian).

2. Zarchan P. Tactical and Strategic Missile Guidance, third edition, Vol. 157, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4344, p. 14.

3. George M. Siouris Missile Guidance and Control Systems, New York, Springer-Verlag, 2004, pp. 166, P. 194—196.

4. Yanushevcky R. Modern missiler guidance, 2008 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business, p. 10, p. 18.

5. Pupkov K. A., Egupov N. D., Kolesnikov L. V.et al. HighPrecision homing systems: Calculation and design. Computational experiment, Moscow, FIZMATLIT, 2011, p. 51, p. 54, p. 294 (in Russian).

6. Arkhangelsk I. I., Afanasiev P. P., Bolotov E. G., Golubev I. S., Matvienko A. M., Mizrahi V. Ya., Novikov V. N., Ostapenko S. N., Svetlov V. G. Design of anti-aircraft guided missiles, Moscow, MAI Publishing house, 2001, pp. 321—344 (in Russian).

7. Thong Do Quang.Synthesis of high-precision missile homing system using proportional guidance method, Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie, 2020, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 242—248 (in Russian).

8. Timofeev N. N., Shestun A. N. Design of non-stationary dynamic control systems of aircraft, Saint Petersburg, BSTU, 2001, pp. 9—43 (in Russian).

9. Thong Do Quang.Synthesis of a missile homing system ta king into account the dynamics of measuring elements, Mekhatro nika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie, 2019, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 251—256 (in Russian).

10. Krinetsky E. I. Homing Systems, Moscow, Mashinostroenie, 1970, pp. 134—151 (in Russian).

11. Fedosov E. A., Bobronnikov V. T., Krasilschikov N. N.et al. Dynamic design of control systems for automatic maneuverable aircraft, Moscow, Mashinostroenie, 1997, pp. 63—65; pp. 87—88 (in Russian).

12. Tolpegin O. A. Mathematical models of aircraft guidance systems, Saint Petersburg, BSTU, 1999, pp. 65—96 (in Russian).

13. Lebedev A. A., Karabanov V. A. Dynamics of f light of unmanned aerial vehicles, Moscow, Mashinostroenie, 1962,pp. 482—503 (in Russian).

14. Lebedev A. A., Karabanov V. A. Dynamics of control systems for unmanned aerial vehicles, Moscow, Mashinostroenie, 1965, pp. 249, pp. 410—442 (in Russian).

15. Gane V. A. , St epanov V. L. Calculation of tracking systems, Minsk, Vysheyshaya shkola publishing house, 1990, pp. 218—228 (in Russian).

16. Met vedev V. S. , Pochemk in V. G. Control System Toolbox, Moscow, ED. DIALOG MEPhI, 1999 (in Russian).

17. Ogata K. Modern Control Engineering, Prentice Hall, Pear son, p. 468.


Review

For citations:


Do Q. Synthesis of a High-Precision Missile Homing System with an Permissible Stability Margin of the Normal Acceleration Stabilization System. Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie. 2021;22(7):365-373. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.22.365-373

Views: 573


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1684-6427 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1253 (Online)